The drop, so to speak, is sudden with no anticipatory cues. The sounds are too thin and high-pitched. The instruments aren't the right choices (I was limited in my options as I was just selecting from remaining Flow patches I'd not yet used). I was hoping that Effervescence would be impressive but it just sounds thin.
The song is muddied and the instruments aren't well mixed. Except for Kotobell, many of the sounds are ones which could be made on an ordinary subtractive synthesizer and so don't show off Flow's unique properties (though those tend to the weird).
The song obviously has no chord progressions to speak of. It's not easy to build a song like this given the limited set of patches I have for Flow at the present time.
This song sounds horrible on the Mac's speakers. The drone sounds like it's being run through a flanger. But it sounds great in headphones. Frustrating. :-( It's muddy and weird, but I didn't have much time to develop it.
It's still a muddy, weird song with instruments that don't hang together very well. The TX216's bass is too pronounced and things don't sit well. Sounds terrible on a laptop speakers, but much better in other contexts.
And I'm not impressed with the K5m. It's noisy and very difficult to code, even with my Edisyn facilities.
It proved very difficult to come up with a lead sound that would work, and I'm far from satisfied with the one I settled on. The problem is that the sound needs to work both at a high register and a low register, and not overpower the other sounds. Some leads worked okay through various speakers (I tested in headphones, NS-10Ms, Elacs, and my car stereo), but sounded very boomy or overly reverberant/resonant in the lower register, or too electric and harsh in the higher register. Frustrating.
The reverb is also overdone.
This is basically every synth I own, and finding places to fit them in the mix was hard. I note that the Voices patch desperately needs to have some release and softer attack, and it does not, so it sounds cheesy.
This is the first song I've made with my TX81Z, which I've recently acquired. I found it very hard to build or find an Oberheim or Blofeld sound which would work with this song -- they're just too synthesizer-like, lots of fat leads and pads, not what I need.
In case you can't understand them, the samples are of my son Matteo saying "I love you robot", "That's a happy robot", and "Bye bye, robot!" I recorded them last year in Rome.
I wound up using almost entirely factory patches on this song.
Improvising over 7/8 is extremely hard. I'm no longer a strong player and it really shows. My improv is far from precise.
I wanted a more elaborate chord set than the modified blues, but wound up abandoning it and I think it shows.
It's not easy to put this much stuff in the mix and have it not interfere. I don't think I necessarily succeeded.
The XT drone pad involved a variety of extended-time wave envelope modulation of the wave index, FM, ringmod, filter cutoff, and detune. I don't know if it was successful but it was fun. Next time I'll use Gizmo's 8-stage wave envelope on the Blofeld and see how that goes.
The Nick's OB6 patch is so named because it was originally a replication of a beautiful patch by Nick Batt at the beginning of his SonicState review of the OB-6. Praise be to PWM.
The drone is too heavy-handed and too ponderous.
The chords are simplistic.
Sounds terrible on my Mac's speakers, as usual. Everything distorts. Sounds great on headphones.
I am falling in the rut of playing lead A, then lead B, then both of them together.
The Microwave II/XT/XTk's wavetable modulation is stepped. I dislike that. I think the Blofeld's wavetable modulation is much better. And there's no way to fade out a chord and fade in a new one. Careful use of the sustain pedal helped. BTW, I am selling my beautiful XT Shadow. If you're interested, contact me.
The "drum arpeggiation" allowed me to try different drum sequences by just playing different chords, which I think is an interesting approach. You'll hear the drum kit constantly changing throughout the song.
I purposely didn't quantize or otherwise clean up the lead, so it sounds sloppy. I wanted to see if that would sound more humane or just messy. I think the jury's still out on that.
Yes, it's in 7/8.
Bass isn't strong enough. I was worried the kick drum was too boomy and toned it down but on listening even on my phone via headphones you can barely hear it. Indeed the whole drum kit should have been brought more to the fore. And as usual, on the Mac speakers it sounds terrible, no bass at all.
I didn't pan the instruments enough. It sounds mono. And I'm still no good on EQ.
It's just a variant on AABA and needs more something.
The song is too hissy. I'm still playing through my mixer and doing one single recording, rather than doing mixing and recording in the box. But I may have to abandon that [or get a better mixer].
The lead is not the right choice. It needs to be something different. (And yes, FinalCountdownSL refers to my original attempt in building that sound: I wanted to replicate the sound in The Final Countdown as an exercise).
There's a short passage where I play the same sequence as in Song 1. Must not fall into a rut.
This is my first real song on Ableton. And wow, Ableton 9 has a terrible interface, with obscure and counterintuitive icons and obtuse and arbitrary hidden locations for doing things. I spent a good 30 minutes trying to figure out why Ableton would suddenly speed up and then slow down: it turns out somehow a bit of the tempo envelope, hidden from view, had been modified. I didn't know it even existed. And it also doesn't help that Ableton, in 2017, can't do NRPN. How did this thing become so popular?
My trusty MX-8R mixer is starting to act up. At some point I will have to replace it. I like the Samson SM-10, plus it'd give me a free rack space, but it doesn't have faders, which I really like. I don't like the Behringer RX1602 or 1202FX.
I think I will sell my Preen FM2. Anyone interested? It's in pristine condition.
I bought a used Lexicon MX200 to replace my dead Microverb-III. I don't know about the MX200. Impulse sounds will cause the reverb to emit very dark, growly echos, and there's no way to brighten it. And Lexicon won't give me the sysex document, forcing me to reverse engineer it. Was cheap though.
The patch is unusual. It's using an Sample and Hold LFO, but it's not connected to the note pitch to make the little blips and bleeps. Rather, it's modulating the index in the Robotic wavetable. I'm proud of it.
The work on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. In short, you can use it more or less freely, but not for commercial use, and attribution is required.